Disclosure: some links on this page are affiliate links. If you buy through them we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Our opinions remain our own. Full disclosure.
LLM Pulse review (2026)
Pros
- Tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews and Gemini on every plan
- Includes sentiment analysis, citation sources and competitor benchmarking
- AI traffic analytics (GA4, Adobe, Plausible and others) and agent/crawler analytics (Cloudflare, Vercel and others)
- White-label reporting and unlimited team members for agency use
- Offers both weekly and daily tracking cadences
Cons
- Claude, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, Meta AI and other models are paid add-ons from €8/mo per model rather than included
- Entry Starter plan is capped at 50 prompts and 1 project
- Daily tracking costs more than the equivalent weekly plan
- API and Looker Studio access require the Scale plan or above
Pricing at a glance
| Entry price | $58/mo |
|---|---|
| Plans | Billed in EUR (excl. VAT). Weekly tracking: Starter €49/mo (50 prompts, 1 project) / Growth €99 (150, 2) / Scale €299 (450, 5) / Scale+ €599 / Scale++ €1,199 / Partner tiers €1,499–3,799 / Enterprise custom. Daily tracking: Starter €79 / Growth €149 / Scale €449 / Scale+ €899 and up. Annual billing = 10× monthly. Vendor site shows Starter ≈ $58 USD. 14-day free trial on weekly Starter, Growth and Scale (card required). |
| Segment | Budget/Agency |
| Platforms tracked | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok, Multiple/Other |
| Pricing last verified | 2026-10-29 |
| Features last checked | 2026-10-29 (source) |
Pricing is checked against LLM Pulse's public pages on a schedule; vendors can change prices without notice — confirm on their site before buying.
What is LLM Pulse?
LLM Pulse is an AI visibility tracking platform positioned in the Budget/Agency segment. It monitors how brands and competitors appear across generative engines, combining citation tracking, sentiment analysis and competitor benchmarking with agency-oriented features like white-labeling and unlimited team members.
Key features
Every plan tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews and Gemini, with weekly or daily tracking frequency depending on plan. Claude, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, Meta AI and other models can be added on a per-model basis starting from €8/mo. The platform also covers citation sources, sentiment analysis, competitor benchmarking, ChatGPT Shopping and app tracking, and Reddit and YouTube source intelligence. For measuring downstream impact, LLM Pulse offers AI traffic analytics through GA4, Adobe, Plausible and other web analytics tools, plus AI agent/crawler analytics via Cloudflare, Vercel and similar infrastructure providers. Additional tools include a GEO Writer, recommendations, and data exports in CSV, Excel and PDF formats. Agencies get white-label reporting and unlimited team members, and technical teams can connect via MCP, Power BI, Zapier, Make and n8n, with API, CLI and Looker Studio access unlocked on Scale plans and above.
Who it’s for
LLM Pulse fits the Budget/Agency segment well: agencies running AI visibility reporting for multiple clients will value the white-labeling and unlimited seats, while smaller in-house teams can start with core engine coverage (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Gemini) at an accessible entry price before deciding whether to add more models.
Limitations
The entry Starter plan is capped at 50 prompts and a single project, which may feel tight for teams tracking many keywords or multiple brands from day one. Coverage of Claude, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek and Meta AI sits behind paid add-ons rather than being bundled, so full cross-engine visibility adds to the base cost. Daily tracking plans also cost more than their weekly equivalents, and deeper integrations like API access and Looker Studio are reserved for the Scale plan and above.
How it compares
Against Geoptie, which tracks 7 engines daily from its entry plan and bundles unlimited GEO audits, LLM Pulse’s entry plan covers fewer engines by default but spreads tracking cadence (weekly or daily) and adds agency integrations like Power BI, Zapier, Make and n8n. Compared with Writesonic GEO, which pairs AI visibility tracking with an AI article writer and SEO agent, LLM Pulse focuses more narrowly on visibility, sentiment and citation tracking plus traffic/agent analytics rather than content generation. Surfer centers on a content editor and SEO suite with AI search tracking as an add-on for Pro and above, whereas LLM Pulse is purpose-built around AI visibility tracking and agency reporting rather than content optimization.
Frequently asked questions
What does LLM Pulse do?
It tracks how brands appear across AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Gemini, reporting on citations, sentiment and competitor benchmarking, with agency features like white-label reports and unlimited team seats.
Who is LLM Pulse for?
It's built for the Budget/Agency segment: agencies managing multiple client accounts who need white-labeling and broad engine coverage, as well as smaller teams tracking AI search visibility on a budget.
How much does LLM Pulse cost to start?
The entry Starter plan starts at around $58/mo (billed in EUR, excl. VAT), covering 50 prompts and 1 project with weekly tracking. A 14-day free trial is available on the Starter, Growth and Scale weekly plans, though a card is required.
How does LLM Pulse compare to Geoptie?
[Geoptie](/tools/geoptie/) tracks 7 engines daily on its entry plan and includes unlimited GEO audits, while LLM Pulse covers 5 engines on every plan with Claude, Copilot, Grok and others available as paid add-ons, plus added agency integrations like Power BI, Zapier and MCP.
Alternatives to LLM Pulse
- Geoptie — Daily AI visibility tracking across 7 engines with unlimited GEO audits and white-label reports.
- Writesonic GEO — AI visibility tracking plus an AI article writer and SEO agent; ChatGPT, Gemini and AI Overviews on self-serve plans.
- Surfer — Content editor and SEO suite with AI search tracking across 5 engines on Pro and above.
Review generated 2026-11-01 from verified data; facts table synced from our tool database (last sync 2026-11-02).